Philosophy Urgent Assignment - repost

Type of service: Essay (any type) Work type: N/A Academic level: College (3-4 years: Junior, Senior) Subject or discipline: Philosophy Title: take- home essay questions Number of sources: 7 Provide digital sources used: No Paper format: MLA # of pages: 5 Spacing: Double spaced # of words: 1375 # of slides: ppt icon 0 Paper details: This teacher is very strict and kind of crazy so please be STRAIGHT forward and stick to the text and film. There is no introduction or conclusion just answer the questions in essay form 500 words EACH !Please take quotes from the books and the films !! 1. There shall be no images of Auschwitz," says one dictum (Lanzmann). and " so let us not invoke the unimaginable" commands another (Didi-Huberman). Rather than taking sides (at least not right away), develop the two sides of the argument. Explain their position on the impossibility of representation. Didi-huberman : Images in Spite of All: Four Photographs from Auschwitz ------------------------- Online Sources for #1: full book: [login to view URL] [login to view URL] JSTOR articles: login: meganmcgregor password: mcgregor16 login in through [login to view URL] link: [login to view URL] FILM: claude lanzman: SHOAH PART 1 [login to view URL] please watch and then quote from the movie to support ideas! ---------------------------------------------- [login to view URL] [login to view URL] ---------------------------------------------- [login to view URL] among the works we have discussed, choose at least two examples where writing/ letters appear in the same space. With aid of the texts dicuss how the two forms inform, interact and or/ modify one another. THIS IS NOT A PIPE: [login to view URL] pillow book: movie: [login to view URL] jean- luc nancy : Distinct Oscilliation [login to view URL] The lingustic sign: Saussure [login to view URL] ------------------------------------------------ 3. Didi-Huberman situates the 4 images shot in Auschwitz " in the fold between two impossibilities." explain what he means. Discuss the impossibilities in the context of the film as well. SAME sources as first question : In spite of it All by didi-huberman full book: [login to view URL] PLEASE SOURCE AND ONLY USE THESE TEXTS: the linguistic sign- saussure michel foucalt- this is not a pipe peter greenaway - pillow book jean-luc nancy- distinct oscillation claude lanzman -shoah PART 1 film did-huberman - in spite of it all peter forgacs - prohibited representation